<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cautious and cagey: what we thought of Cameron Direct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/</link>
	<description>Bringing news and views from the roaring capital of the Thames Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dazmando</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dazmando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53727</guid>
		<description>A very interesting review. Perhaps the floor was full of bloggers. I thought I better add mine here.

http://bracknellblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/david-cameron-direct-in-reading.html

Thanks fot the Links to Nick Clegg&#039;s visit. Interesting reading the thought that we are going into recession back then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting review. Perhaps the floor was full of bloggers. I thought I better add mine here.</p>
<p><a href="http://bracknellblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/david-cameron-direct-in-reading.html" rel="nofollow">http://bracknellblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/david-cameron-direct-in-reading.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks fot the Links to Nick Clegg&#8217;s visit. Interesting reading the thought that we are going into recession back then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reckons</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53719</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reckons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53719</guid>
		<description>Good review and I agree with you about his negative tone as I blogged about myself here: http://markreckons.blogspot.com/2010/01/cameron-direct-event-in-reading-review.html

Whatever happened to &quot;Let sunshine win the day?&quot;!

I asked the first question(s) about his changed stance on drugs policy and he did not really answer it. I wanted to know why he had changed his mind and instead he talked about the &quot;message&quot; that drugs policy should send out. I expected he would have his pre-prepared response for this but it is disappointing when politicians do not properly answer questions and I felt this was the case with quite a lot of his responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review and I agree with you about his negative tone as I blogged about myself here: <a href="http://markreckons.blogspot.com/2010/01/cameron-direct-event-in-reading-review.html" rel="nofollow">http://markreckons.blogspot.com/2010/01/cameron-direct-event-in-reading-review.html</a></p>
<p>Whatever happened to &#8220;Let sunshine win the day?&#8221;!</p>
<p>I asked the first question(s) about his changed stance on drugs policy and he did not really answer it. I wanted to know why he had changed his mind and instead he talked about the &#8220;message&#8221; that drugs policy should send out. I expected he would have his pre-prepared response for this but it is disappointing when politicians do not properly answer questions and I felt this was the case with quite a lot of his responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Robinson</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53705</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53705</guid>
		<description>A fair perspective on the evening.

I tend to think we did learn something in the way he was evasive and utterly insubstantial on various matters. For that is the way he wants to work - we have to research the Tories ourselves if we want to be better informed about their intentions.

I apologise if I was too differential. I wasn&#039;t there to either praise him or talk my way onto the local news in some way by some kind of frontal assault. But his answer spoke volumes, confirming Obama&#039;s &quot;lightweight&quot; assessment of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fair perspective on the evening.</p>
<p>I tend to think we did learn something in the way he was evasive and utterly insubstantial on various matters. For that is the way he wants to work &#8211; we have to research the Tories ourselves if we want to be better informed about their intentions.</p>
<p>I apologise if I was too differential. I wasn&#8217;t there to either praise him or talk my way onto the local news in some way by some kind of frontal assault. But his answer spoke volumes, confirming Obama&#8217;s &#8220;lightweight&#8221; assessment of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McGarvey</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53704</link>
		<dc:creator>John McGarvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53704</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,

Thanks for your thoughts. I see your point about the &quot;elevator pitch&quot;, but to me it felt like that was his best chance to sum up what he&#039;d do differently. If I&#039;m honest, I came away thinking that if the next few years are going to be tough whatever, then what&#039;s the point in voting at all?

As for the Labour activists, well, I was given a leaflet by a chap I later realised was Naz Sarkar, Labour&#039;s parliamentary candidate for Reading West. It had a list of questions to ask Cameron on it. I&#039;ll dig it out later.

As protests go, it&#039;s fair to say it wasn&#039;t exactly high profile...

Cheers,

John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts. I see your point about the &#8220;elevator pitch&#8221;, but to me it felt like that was his best chance to sum up what he&#8217;d do differently. If I&#8217;m honest, I came away thinking that if the next few years are going to be tough whatever, then what&#8217;s the point in voting at all?</p>
<p>As for the Labour activists, well, I was given a leaflet by a chap I later realised was Naz Sarkar, Labour&#8217;s parliamentary candidate for Reading West. It had a list of questions to ask Cameron on it. I&#8217;ll dig it out later.</p>
<p>As protests go, it&#8217;s fair to say it wasn&#8217;t exactly high profile&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Millen</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Millen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53699</guid>
		<description>Hah, that was &lt;a href=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4274942874_5cae18f3a4.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a frequent pose&lt;/a&gt; wasn&#039;t it!

Pretty much agree with your thoughts about the session.  Although I do think the &quot;elevator pitch&quot; question is a no-win for any politician, particularly in tough times.  Realism is depressing, yet we claim to want political honesty?  And regardless of what caveats are made, any hint of a plan will be treated as a firm commitment by the media.  Tricky!

Glad I made the effort to go, despite feeling ill yesterday.  Definitely the kind of thing we want to see more of from politicians!

Oh - according to one article there were Labour activists handing out leaflets outside who claimed they weren&#039;t allowed in.  Did anyone else see them?  I certainly didn&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, that was <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4274942874_5cae18f3a4.jpg" rel="nofollow">a frequent pose</a> wasn&#8217;t it!</p>
<p>Pretty much agree with your thoughts about the session.  Although I do think the &#8220;elevator pitch&#8221; question is a no-win for any politician, particularly in tough times.  Realism is depressing, yet we claim to want political honesty?  And regardless of what caveats are made, any hint of a plan will be treated as a firm commitment by the media.  Tricky!</p>
<p>Glad I made the effort to go, despite feeling ill yesterday.  Definitely the kind of thing we want to see more of from politicians!</p>
<p>Oh &#8211; according to one article there were Labour activists handing out leaflets outside who claimed they weren&#8217;t allowed in.  Did anyone else see them?  I certainly didn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53697</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53697</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there&#039;s a report of the meeting here by the looks of it:

www.readingchronicle.co.uk/articles/1/5981/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s a report of the meeting here by the looks of it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/articles/1/5981/" rel="nofollow">http://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/articles/1/5981/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McGarvey</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53695</link>
		<dc:creator>John McGarvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53695</guid>
		<description>@Simond:

Good point- apparently he visited Reading in 2008:

http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/s/2037401_chance_to_meet_lib_dem_boss

Good on him. Not sure how I missed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simond:</p>
<p>Good point- apparently he visited Reading in 2008:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/s/2037401_chance_to_meet_lib_dem_boss" rel="nofollow">http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/s/2037401_chance_to_meet_lib_dem_boss</a></p>
<p>Good on him. Not sure how I missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Waugh</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53687</guid>
		<description>I guess Cameron knows that he is going to win the next election simply through &#039;sick of the current lot&#039; factor, so he doesn&#039;t have to promise anything at all. 

To me, 1997 felt like an amazing moment of new hope, although Labour haven&#039;t been a complete success of course. 2010 feels like the start of a number of years under a government I have nothing in common with and disagree with about almost everything. Bad times ahead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Cameron knows that he is going to win the next election simply through &#8216;sick of the current lot&#8217; factor, so he doesn&#8217;t have to promise anything at all. </p>
<p>To me, 1997 felt like an amazing moment of new hope, although Labour haven&#8217;t been a complete success of course. 2010 feels like the start of a number of years under a government I have nothing in common with and disagree with about almost everything. Bad times ahead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://readingroars.com/cautious-and-cagey-what-we-thought-of-cameron-direct/#comment-53685</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingroars.com/?p=864#comment-53685</guid>
		<description>Actually, Nick Clegg has been doing it for some time now, albeit on a less glamorous scale. http://meet.nickclegg.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Nick Clegg has been doing it for some time now, albeit on a less glamorous scale. <a href="http://meet.nickclegg.com/" rel="nofollow">http://meet.nickclegg.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

